Friday, August 25, 2006

How bloggers should take on the government?

Among other things to be discussed at :

Blogging and Governance - How blogs are being used to provide assistance during times of crisis, uncovering potential crimes, activities, taking on the government, etc.
Well, the best way to take on the adversary is to infiltrate it. We should have bloggers embedded within the government.

Now you may think that is smart or plain corny, depending upon your knowledge of blogging and/or government. You might even think, it’s late on a Friday evening and I have been drinking and reading General Sun Tzu’s The Art of War. But if you already have an opinion, you haven’t understood what I want to say. Let me finish.

One evening I got talking to a delightful old woman who had been running a successful NGO for a long time. However, she had lately begun to drift away from her work. Don’t remember the precise conversation, but I recognised the problems she described in her NGO as the same that you see within the government. Her NGO had become big and taken on aspects of a bureaucracy. I said as much to her and she seemed to agree. (I told you she was charming, didn’t I?)

Okay, now my point is: bloggers are smart, honest, hardworking, polite, and very dependable people. If they interchange places with lazy, self-serving, opinionated and corrupt colleagues of mine in the government, what would happen? You’d get the same quality of governance and slightly worse blogging. People matter, but most population of sufficient size are nearly same.

However, analysing issues, like bloggers; organising information, like wiki’s; and using the emergent power from co-operating entities—these are skills that can be employed in delivering governance, as much as in taking on the government.

For starters folks, I’d be over at the camp to learn something from you.

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Something to wait for!



Conferences don’t excite me anymore, although I may consider the next India Today Conclave—if they invite nicely and not just send over the invitation package. Which too they have neglected to do these last four years.

But I learnt about this conference called (September 9 and 10, 2006) and can’t wait to get there. It’s unlike any conference that I’ve heard of, but not unlike how people often work when they are having most fun!

And I’m blogging about it? You can guess how excited I must be because I hardly ever blog about anything. But your guess would be wrong because I don’t blog about the most exciting things in my life.

So I’d give you a clue. This is history being made and I want to claim that I saw it coming.

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Makes no sense

Visited my blog after a long time.

So far it's a set of disparate, infrequent posts that have little in common. And the blog as a whole lacks purpose.

When I realise that, why does it exists?

For one, I realised this only now.

Secondly, realising where it fails, and why, is progress. Always a good reason to do something.

Thanks to you for dropping by. Have a good day!

Friday, January 06, 2006

The Swift Pace of Online Business

The people over at Amazon.com are swift.

As I had discovered earlier, ordering and downloading an e-document on Amazon is a breeze, even though I received something different from what was offered.

Well, they have sent a quick and polite promise of refund:

I've requested a refund of $6.00 to your credit card. This refund should go through within 2-3 business days and will appear as a credit on your next credit card billing statement.


(Thank you, folks!)

Have they fixed the error that led to this situation in the first place?

Not yet. As I write, the digtial edition of the book at $ 6 is still on offer: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0684841479

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Perils of Buying Online

On January 2, 2006 I was looking for Michael E. Porter's book "The Competitive Advantage of Nations" on Amazon.com.

Amazon described the product as:

Hardcover: 896 pages
Publisher: Free Press (June 1, 1998)
ISBN: 0684841479

Among "Other Editions" was indicated a Digital Download in pdf format for $ 6.00.

I need the book for my own dissertation and thought it would be nice to obtain a digital copy because one can search for information, bookmark for later reference, and quote the original text accurately.

The whole process of ordering and downloading the book was a breeze. But to my horror what I received instead was a 1990 article from the Harvard Business Review—bearing the same title and from the same author.

Understandably, Amazon has a "no return" policy on downloads of pdf files. Nevertheless, I've written to the folks at Amazon.com for a refund because what they provided isn’t what they offered.

As I wait for their response, two questions pop into my mind:

  1. Should I actually ask for a pdf of the book that I want rather than a refund? After all, they accepted the order and charged my credit card, which makes it a contract.

  2. What if I had actually ordered the paper and got the book instead?